JOMO MANUEL WILLIAMS FOR CONGRESS NY 13

DSA -vs- Democrat politicians are all in the media news pointing fingers at each other for intentionally allowing, and promoting Gentrification within their districts by design. Charging one another (themselves, each other) of faciliatating Gentrification in return for contribution bribes & political voting power, in Harlem, Upper West Side, Washington heights , Inwood, and through out NY 13 Congressional District!

---

---

​The Hidden Link: Why Citizens Are Fleeing Sanctuary Jurisdictions (and wanna be sanctuary jurisdictions called “Welcoming Cities “)?
​Look at the data, and a devastating pattern emerges across our nation’s major urban centers. A wave of progressive governance is actively driving citizens out of Sanctuary Jurisdictions—with New York City leading the exodus.
​While mainstream media outlets mask these departures behind vague economic jargon, the political common denominator is undeniable. We are witnessing a systemic consolidated form of Political, Institutional, and Sanctuary Gentrification, where radical policies are intentionally utilized to price out, displace, and replace the existing population. Under the influence of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)—who are currently locked in a fierce political civil war with the establishment Democratic Party—sanctuary leaders have systematically reshaped local government. Instead of prioritizing existing citizens, they practice adversity in their administrative and judicial decisions in hiring, housing, promotions, ticketing, and admin law enforcement are increasingly weaponized against the interests of native New Yorkers, residents that Assimilate & integrated , and hard-working Americans.
​The consequences of these policies speak for themselves:
​Fiscal Collapse: Multi-billion-dollar budget deficits directly triggered by local migrant crises.
​Economic Strain: Threats of skyrocketing inheritance and property taxes unstabilizing multi-generational families out of their homes.
​Corporate Flight: Destructive sanctuary policies that create hostile business environments, chasing major employers out of town.
​Threats of Anarchism & Anti-American Hate: Ideological policies that undermine public safety and traditional American values, leaving residents feeling like foreigners in their own cities.
​Below, I have compiled four separate investigative videos detailing the record-shattering domestic out-migration from these regions. While the creators of these videos focus on the symptoms—the soaring rents, changing demographics, and vanishing middle class—look closer. Every single city highlighted in these reports shares one defining trait: they are all codified Sanctuary Jurisdictions and Welcoming Cities.
​Watch below to see the real-world cost of progressive overreach:
​

A Critical Thinker Must Recognize That These Cruel Instances Of Institutional And Sanctuary Jurisdiction Gentrifications Are Not Accidental —They Are Done By Design.

​▪ PROTECT LOCAL INSTITUTIONS & CITIZENS
➢ Stop Agency Weaponization: End the targeting and bureaucratic harassment of native New Yorkers, working families, and law-abiding assimilated immigrants by state/city bodies (including DFS, NYS UCS, Dept of Finance, Municipal Courts, and Parking Violations Agencies).
➢ Defend Civic Assimilation: Protect patriotic working families who support American law and order from radical anti-sovereignty agendas & agents.

Democratic Socialists of Anti-American are weaponizing NYC AND State agencies, like DFS, NYS UCS, Department of Finance, Municipal Court, or a specialized Traffic and Parking Violations Agency to target Native New Yorkers and immigrants who Assimilate (not Anti-American) to institute their socialism and sanctuary policies.

​Sanctuary leaders are actively prioritizing undocumented residents over legal citizens to build a brand-new, dependent voting base. They view independent citizens, who could exercise their discretion to vote freely, as a direct threat to their grip on political power. Therefore, driving citizens out isn’t just a byproduct of their policies; it is the ultimate strategy to secure their political positions.

​Take Action: Support the Fight to Restore Accountability
​If you want a leader who will stand up against progressive overreach, defend the rule of law, and place the interests of hard-working American citizens first, get involved today.
​Reclaim your existence. Do not allow yourself or your children’s foundation to be run over and spooked by radical agendas

Historically, immigrants arrived eager to assimilate, contribute, and build the American Dream. Today, radical organizations like the DSA spew anti-American, anarchist, and open-border rhetoric—venom that discourages unification and threatens our common interest in national security and public order.

Today, debates surrounding immigration and political polarization often highlight deep divisions within our communities, posing challenges to our -again- shared interests in national security, social cohesion, and public order.

Discussions around these issues reveal tensions that strain relationships between long-standing community members and newer arrivals. Instances of mutual distrust, discrimination, or perceived hostility undermine the cooperative spirit that has traditionally defined our neighborhoods. It is essential to address these friction points constructively rather than allowing divisive rhetoric to erode community trust. While we must avoid broad generalizations, fostering mutual respect is vital to ensuring that everyone feels valued and respected regardless of background.

I blame the Democrat party for its political stratergy to divide to control its different base of supporters. When I had recently inquired new arrival aquaintance why they look down upon foundational citizens his response was “that is what they tell us when they process in country, …” (that real life statement collaborate with several testaments made by foriegn residents online). Said arrogance is too fueled by the Democrat government controlled led sancturary jurisdictions that neglect Black & Brown foundation citizens (making them the bottom of the barrel under class) while favoring and tailor making successful paths for its immmigrant class, as they see them as their most loyal voting base that must rely on their advocacy for existence here in the U.S..

These days, the DSA (AKA- “Demaguoges Socialists of Anti America & Anarchism”), has adversley influenced (and recently revealed) a divide that was not appearant before. The same immigrant class, that Foundational American Citizens have always embraced in past as friends; employeed; shared meals and laughs with, etc.; are now becoming cruelly antagonistic, despising, and gushing hate towards Foundational Americans. Unjustly referring to them openly out loud as “Lazy Americans” “Akata” “Abeed” “Spics” “Devils”; using their positions (security; Admin or judicial decision makers; medical attendants; etc.) to harass, undermine and discriminate base on American nationality status. Maybe many had always held these hateful sentiments in secrete and now the DSA just made it more comfrontable for them to let it out loud in the open, and perfom them out blatantly in the open. Of course we do not want to blanket indict (because that will make you no better than the ones hating based on nationality) but it now appear that too many “bad [political] apples are spoiling the bunch”. These rotten political apples are not unifying & hamonizing, instead they are dividing & alienating!

We must reject divisive agendas that tear away from, and at, the social fabric binding our communities. Instead, we must champion policies that reinforce equality, justice, and the rule of law—restoring control to our borders and strengthening civic integration while preserving a unified, cohesive, and multicultral national identity.

---

Smaller Government, Less taxes, Less Spending, Public Safety -Versus- Larger Gov, More Taxes & Spending, Less Public Safety.

In 2025 NYC incurred a $12 billion deficit due to its sanctuary city status, that Darializa strongly supports.

In turn that $12B deficit sancturary city spending cost (right to shelter, and other humanitarian aid) had DSA Mayor Mamdani scrambling to cover up, to balance the NYC’s budget. He proposed and implemented all sorts of policies which adversely shifted the Sanctuary costs onto the citizen on NYC. From pied-à-terre taxes (which regular citizens are too receiving tax notices for); inheritance taxes; no free parking; defund police; plus more.

The simple mathematical equation to less taxes is to decrease the need of spending cost.

DSA’s, calls to abolish law enforcement is not only political malpractice but too is a total disregard to public safety. DSA see abolishing law enforcement as a way to (1) lessening detention & control over illegal presences, thus less monitoring over the illegal votes DEMS & DSA rely on to grab and maintain political power (2) also as a way for DEMS AND DSA to shift and hide cost spending for its sanctuary policies.

---

Radical Racialized Residential “Cleansing” Without intervention, 3333 Broadway [and Harlem in a whole] will be entirely purged of affordable housing by the time Columbia [University] completes their campus in the year 2030. The change will ensue along racial lines, replacing a predominantly African American and Latino demographic with largely [DSA] newcomers.
By Dorian Bon, (CAGe)

LAW PROPOSAL
ANTI GENTRIFICATION HATE LAW

In October of 2024, I had created and proposed to SDNY Federal Court the below Anti-Gentrication law proposal as draft for NYC legislators and executive adoption. Since then I have identified specific elements and causes to NYC’s various Gentification campaigns (see all above in this section – Political, Institutional, and Sanctuary Gentrification) that give cause to amend below proposal. Nonetheless, the below is a sound foundation to begin.

LAW PROPOSAL
ANTI GENTRIFICATION HATE LAW
Law Proposal: Chapter 40 – NEW YORK CITY
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION sect. 907 –
SECT 907.1 Statutory Purpose & Definitions
For purpose of the following law proposal there are
3 defined forms & types of gentrifications (A)
Organic: that happens naturally (B) Government
Sanctioned: that occurs after a lawful & fully
processed – mandate, order, or other written
promulgated legal process by the Government, and
(C) illegal/unlawful/hate – The unlawful act of
intentionally targeting population groups for
displacement due to the actual or perceived race,
color, religion, lawful source of income status,
disability, veteran status, familia status, or national
origin of any person
SECT 907.2 Individual or Conspiracy to
Promote Illegal Gentrification
or Unlawfully Prevent Residency
(A) Any person acting alone or any two or
more persons who conspire to promote or
prevent the residency of any person or
population due to the actual or perceived race,
color, religion, lawful income status, familial
25 / 128
Status, disability, Veteran status, or national
origin of any person or population by unlawful
means and which an individual or conspiracy
is acted upon by one or more of the parties
thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor (if
victim is an individual) or Felony (if victim is a
population group), and, if violated by a
corporation, it shall in addition forfeit its
charter; a violation by conspiracy will be
further penalized by a sentence enhancement
punishment of one degree higher.
(B) It shall be unlawful to coerce, intimidate,
threaten, or interfere with any person in the
exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his
having exercised or enjoyed, or on account of
his having aided or encouraged any other
person in the exercise or enjoyment of, any
right granted or protected by this section; a
violation of this subsection carries the same
penalty as subsect a;
(C) An aggrieved person or population may
commence either a civil action or class action
suit to seek customary relief, punitive, and
treble damages, but not limited to said relief,
under this subsection whether or not a
complaint has been filed;
26 / 128
(D) The NYC Civil Court shall issue injunctive
relief or temporary restraining order, upon
application by an aggrieved party claiming
violation of this section; the court must rule
and decide upon that application within 24
hours but no later than 48 hours of its
presentation to the court for ruling;
(E) If application for TRO or injunctive relief is
still pending beyond 48 hours without final
disposition on motion, the presiding judge will
immediately recuse self (sua sponte) from
matter for judicial misconduct proceedings,
and the reassigned judge must rule on same
application within 12 hours, or too recuse self
for judicial misconduct proceedings; after 72
hours pending without disposition, the NYC
court must immediately transfer the
application to State court for immediate review
and disposition;
(F) A person, population, or entity, may also
bring and prosecute either a civil and/or
criminal action for a violation of subsection a
or b, of this section, on behalf of a person,
population, and/or for the Government. The
action shall be brought (Qui tam) in the name
of the Government. The action may be
preliminarily dismissed only if 2 from the
27 / 128
following 3, consent, the Court, the Assigned
Counsel of matter, and the Human Rights
Commission give written consent to the
dismissal and their reasons for consenting;
the given consent reason for dismissal is
appealable and subjected to higher review.
(G) Evidence of disparate impact and/or
treatment will be admissible and heard in all
stages within proceedings, civil or criminal,
being prosecuted under this section;
(H) If an indigent pro se litigant bring action
pursuant to subsect d, of this section, s/he
must first obtain a certificate of meritorious
claim signed by a private counsel of his/her
choice; cost for first hour of certificate
consultation shall be paid via voucher issued
by the court from the collection budget
described in subsection J; an attorney of the
bar must in writing either sign or decline to
sign the certificate upon presentation; a denial
to endorse a presented certificate of merit by
a litigant to counsel is reviewable by NY CPLR
Art. 78, or Declaratory Judgment;
(I) If certificate of merit, is signed by counsel,
the counsel whom signature is beared on
such certificate will be appointed by court, as
the attorney who will prosecute the matter in
28 / 128
court; attorney fees will be paid from the
collection budget described in subsect J, of
this section;
(J) The budget for certificate consultation, and
subsequent attorney fees, will consist of funds
deriving from a cooperative collection and/or
contribution, from and of the following
budgets: NYS BAR LRIS $35 referral
payment; NYS EXC § 832; NYS County Law
Article 18-B; CPLR 1011; NYC Local law 53;
NYC Int 0673-2022; and NYC Int 0214-2014
The above proposed law language drafted from: 18
U.S. Code § 249; 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq; 31 U.S.
Code § 3730; 28 U.S. Code § 1915; NYS Elect L. §
17–152 and § 17–150; N.Y. Exec. Law § 292(36);
NYS EXC § 832; NYS County Law Article 18-B;
CPLR 1011; NYC Int 0673-2022; NYC Int
0214-2014; New York State Bar Association
Lawyer Referral website; Article VI, Section 22, of
the Constitution of the State of New York; and
DOJ https://www.ojp.gov/taxonomy/term/private-prosecution
Law Proposal By Jomo Williams

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12